80% or above you should be good and not detectable at inspection stations. ***FYI, because our cars are so small, if you really want to block the most heat out, you need something on the front windshield. You would go this option if your main goal is cosmetics. This will be the least expensive option because there is little heat rejection. It will have a slight Green Hue but its not bad and almost not noticeable (most certainly not as aggressive as the CIR).ģm color stable (Had this on my Miata NC) or Suntek Carbon series (had this on my 370z). 3M Crystalline is unlike any other automotive window film in that it is made of over 200 metal-free nano- layers of polyester, yet is thinner than a Post-it Note. If you want to stay legal, it is the darkest legal film you can put with VLT at 40%. This film will give you decent heat rejection without breaking the bank. Crystalline rates in at 97 IRR and is the only product that comes close to Spectra PhotoSync in IR rejection out of the scores of manufacturers on the market. Suntek CXP (Had this on my BMW and currently on the woman's Mazda 3). Suntek CIR (currently on my ND) will be the best bang for your buck if you want good heat rejection, but has a strong green hue to it when the sun is directly on it (It's a great film against the suns heat, and looks good at certain angles, but the green is a bit too much sometimes when looking from the inside to out - my next car i'm choosing F1 Pinnacle again, only probably going darker) It's not cheap, but not as expensive as 3m crystalline. I guess it depends on the car window as well.įormula 1 Pinnacle Series (Originally had it on my ND, but their darkest legal wasn't as dark as i'd like it to be so i switched to darker tint) will give you the most grey neutral look. My buddy has the 3M Crystalline 25% but on his car it has a reflective blue to it. TSER/IRR on par with 3M crystalline series but half the price of 3M (hamel guy showed me discounted package price dunno is marketing strategy or not, the poster design also does not look very professional.), with 10 years warranty some more, 1.5k-2k can get 95-97 IRR, 56TSER with security films (5mil).ound. So far no low angle haze or graininess noticed. It does have a brownish hue to it through (looks good on certain cars). Similar to Xpel XR Prime Plus, the Spectra Photosync 70 is crystal clear. My folks have 3M Crystalline 40 on their SUV and it blocks out more heat than my 25% Suntek Ceramic film. Light tint rejects up to 60 of solar energy and up to 97 of heat-producing infrared rays for the ultimate in comfort. The Crystalline Series rejects more heat than many dark films without changing the appearance of your vehicle, making it the superior choice for comfort. It's harder to install and it is premium film, therefor it will be the most expensive of the bunch. A clear breakthrough in automotive window films. A 39% tint will meter at 31% to 32% on our cars while 40% VLT film meters at 33% to 35%ģm Crystalline will provide the most heat rejection compared to any other tint and is simply the best there is. If you go legal, remember the tint law is nothing under 35% +\-2%. Do you want it for cosmetics or function?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |